What (or who) helps hospitality companies improve faster? Consumer-led campaigns on plastic straws have pushed many hospitality companies to consider alternatives or simply ban single-use plastics. So far, however, the vast majority of guests still choose their hotels mainly by location and price. Using levers such as taxation or legislation, governments are also increasing the pressure. Recent examples include the European Union's ban on a series of single-use plastics such as cutlery, straws, and stirrers by 2021. Many states across the US are implementing similar bans. Beyond plastics, carbon pricing initiatives are in place or planned in more than 45 countries. The EU's Energy Performance of Buildings Directive requires all new buildings to be nearly zero-energy (NZEB) by the end of 2020 and existing buildings to transition towards NZEB by 2050. Finally, the hospitality industry's self-regulation and voluntary codes of conduct are considered popular approaches in dealing with sustainability challenges, but at times with limited success. Facing mounting environmental issues, are all three parties (government, consumer, industry) playing an equally important role? Do consumers have the foresight to act as a useful lever of change? Taxes and legislation are in the pipeline across the globe, so what needs to be done today to minimize the risk of getting hit? And how about driving consumer behavior change through inspiring guest experiences?

Patricio  Gonzalez Morel
Patricio Gonzalez Morel
Sustainability and resource efficiency consultant

Consumer-led campaigns can be effective drivers mainly for issues that are readily visible and verifiable, such as the use of single-use plastics. However, consumers don't see or understand what really takes place behind scenes and, as a result, can't gauge the true green credential of any property. Green hotel certification schemes should ideally fill this information gap and help consumers to identify the properties that do make a serious effort toward sustainability.

Unfortunately that doesn't work so well because 1) some certifications schemes are not rigorous and don't push hotels to achieve significant results; 2) consumers don't know which certification schemes are good and which are not; 3) the more rigorous certification schemes are typically more expensive and therefore less likely to be picked by hotel owners and GMs; and 4) clever GMs, chief engineers or sustainability officers can easily bend the truth and trick most certification processes.

 

The industry is not an effective driver for sustainability either. Owners and GMs are often too busy trying to increase revenues or keeping their hotels afloat to worry about sustainability. In addition, they don't have the knowledge (and are not willing to pay for the knowledge or take the time to acquire the knowledge) to understand what they can do to boost the efficiency with which they use energy, water, materials and chemicals in their operations. Although ignorance is apparently bliss, owners and GMs do miss out on a huge opportunity when they fail to see the connection between sustainability and profitability and overlook the easy improvement measures that lurk in every one of their departments and in every corner of their properties. After all, these abundant low hanging fruits typically yield ROIs ranging from 100 to more than 10,000% and, therefore, could have a significant impact on the financial well-being of an industry that operates with an average profit margin of only 5%.

 

In my view, this leaves governments as the only candidates for quickly driving sustainability in the hotel industry through taxation and regulation. Although this will not be a palatable solution, it will be beneficial to the environment as well as to hotels. If done right, it will finally force hoteliers to do the enormously profitable things they should have been doing for the past 50 years, but we're too busy, too distracted, too happy with status quo, or too blissfully ignorant to do. And, as the icing on the cake, it will help hoteliers protect the destinations that support their livelihood and keep climate change at bay.

View all 17 views in this viewpoint