World-class distribution was once one of the key value-adds of signing up with a hotel chain or brand. Today, however, this advantage has been severely eroded to the point where independent properties can access better and more cost-effective distribution channels.

From a distribution perspective, is the era of the hotel chain coming to an end?

IDeaS - A SAS Company

This viewpoint is co-created with IDeaS a SAS company
More information

Jay Stein
Jay Stein
Head of Dream Hotels at Hyatt

In short, no. The era of the hotel chain is not coming to an end as they certainly bring value to the industry in many ways, but the way hotels do business is unquestionably changing. While in the past a hotelier needed to work with a large chain or brand in order to have world-class distribution, in today's environment this is no longer essential to success. Smaller chains, boutique brands, and independent hotels have more options when it comes to distribution through advances in technology. This inevitably began to level the playing field in that regard.

At Dream Hotel Group we work with Sabre, which allows us to connect directly with over 600 OTA partners, over 800 Tour Operators, and more than 600K travel agents who log into the GDS to make reservations every day, in addition to powering our booking engines. Working with a large chain could actually be limiting in a specific hotel's distribution depending on the chain level agreements. Many large chains have distribution clauses in their management contracts, preventing individual hotels from working with companies that do not have a chain level agreement with that brand. So if, as an example, you want to work with Airbnb, but your chain does not have an agreement, the hotel will not be able to distribute on that channel. As a boutique brand, we are nimbler and able to move more quickly with new/upcoming partners. As a boutique collection, we recognize that all of these different distribution partners bring additional value & revenue to our brand and as a result, we are able to forge those partnerships with limited constraints.

Another example of how large chains can hinder your distribution: the chain may have contracted discounts or mandatory rate plans with an OTA such as Expedia. As an individual hotel part of that chain, you would not be able to opt-out, even if you didn't want to be part of that offer. At Dream Hotel Group, we are more flexible in our negotiations to allow our individual properties more control of their rate/promotional strategies. Parity is a big part of agreements between large chains and OTA partners. Chains are successful at maintaining parity. However, chains establish parity by limiting the available rate plans that a hotel can sell directly on its site, ensuring that the same rate plan is distributed to the OTA partner. Companies like Dream Hotel Group have more flexibility in rate strategy and how/where they distribute rates. To an extent, we can distribute a limitless number of rate plans on our websites and distribute these rate plans to other channels on a need basis only.

All this isn't to say big box brands/hotel chains don't have their advantages. At the end of the day boutique hotels are still going to do what they do – and, in our case, that is to consistently deliver a high-touch, high-style, high-design lifestyle experience that's truly unique and authentic to its locale – while the big chains, the Marriotts, Hyatts and IHGs of the world, do what they do. Distribution costs are just one part of doing business and what brands vs. chains vs. independents choose to spend is different for every property, every situation. 

View all 8 views in this viewpoint