Cornell Quarterly Article Highlights Michelin Star Ratings
Ithaca , NY |A ground-breaking analysis of Michelin star-rated restaurants is the newest featured article from the Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly. The article, “Behind the Stars: A Concise Typology of Michelin Restaurants in Europe,” presents an overview and analysis of the vaunted restaurant rating system. The article is available at no charge from The Center for Hospitality Research, publisher of the...
Ithaca , NY | A ground-breaking analysis of Michelin star-rated restaurants is the newest featured article from the Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly. The article, “Behind the Stars: A Concise Typology of Michelin Restaurants in Europe,” presents an overview and analysis of the vaunted restaurant rating system. The article is available at no charge from The Center for Hospitality Research, publisher of the Cornell Quarterly.
Authors Colin Johnson, Bernard Surlemont, Pascale Nicod, and Frederick Revaz followed the fates of 36 Michelin-rated restaurant owners, interviewing the restaurateurs and tallying how many gained or lost stars over a ten-year period. Although Michelin does not reveal its rating criteria (and did not participate in the article), the authors were able to identify many of the factors that underlie the complex star-rating system. Chief among these, of course, is the quality of the food and service. Indeed, the Michelin-ranked restaurateurs commented on the pressure they feel to be inventive, since the star rating rests almost entirely on the skills of the chef. Tradition also plays a large part in the rating, because Michelin is slow to add a star to a restaurant’s rating, but also is slow to remove a star.
A key finding is the extent to which the chefs are themselves motivated by their passion for haute cuisine. Success for the Michelin-rated chefs requires support from families, especially since financing usually comes from family and private sources. Although Michelin is slow to reduce a restaurant’s star rating, the loss of a star is catastrophic—causing sales to drop as much as 50 percent in some cases. Even with their star rating intact, the authors deemed half of the restaurants as not profitable.
Comments
Comments for this content
0 comments available