Expert Views (7)

The most significant impact might not be operational, but psychological. Why? Because it's the hotel industry's fault. Let me explain:

For years, hotels have trained guests to treat bookings as placeholders: reserve today, decide later. Airlines did the opposite. We rarely question paying upfront for a flight, even months in advance, because the category has educated us that commitment is part of the transaction. Hotels now need to do the same.

Full prepayment is not necessarily a loss of flexibility; it is a redefinition of value. The key will be segmentation. Guests who want maximum freedom should still have it, but that flexibility should carry a premium. Meanwhile, prepaid rates can reward commitment with a better price, added value, or a smoother experience.

From a business perspective, this shift can reduce cancellation volatility, improve forecasting, protect revenue, and give hotels a stronger base for upselling before arrival. But if handled poorly, it can feel like a penalty rather than a proposition.

The winning brands will not simply force prepayment. They will explain it, package it, and make the guest feel they are choosing certainty, not surrendering control.

In the end, this is a mindset change. If we accept prepaying flights, why not hotels?

In my view, the Full Prepayment Model is not the future of hospitality. While full prepayment has been practiced for decades for charter vacations, extended beach vacations and unique experiences like safari tours, it’s definitely not user friendly as far as plain hotel bookings are concerned. 

Merchant bookings - fully prepaid bookings - at both Expedia and Booking  now represent over 70% of the total gross bookings. Improved cash flow, controlling the price the customer pays, opportunities to bundle hotel stays with air, transportation and experiences are some of the reasons for the OTA preferences of the merchant model.

For hoteliers, offering flexible cancellation policies provide definite competitive advantages over the OTAs. This is the main reason all major hotel chains adhere to 24- or 48- hour cancellation policies.

Independents should offer potential guest several pricing options:

  • Rack Rates allowing 24- or 48- hour cancellation policies
  • Rates requiring non-refundable prepayment of first roomnight, but allowing cancellations of the rest of the stay without penalty. 
  • Advance booking rates: reward your guests for booking early and allowing you to have peace of mind with solid business on the books. Offer 10%-15% discounts for non-refundable 14- or 21-day advance bookings, based on your property’s booking window. 

The biggest impact of full prepayment is that booking a hotel becomes a much bigger commitment for guests.

Hotels benefit from fewer cancellations, better cash flow, and more predictable occupancy.

But guests may book less often or take longer to decide because they must pay upfront.

Trusted brands like Marriott International and Booking.com may benefit most, while smaller hotels could struggle more with guest trust.

BNPL services may become very important because they make upfront payment feel more flexible and less risky.

I think part of the problem is also self-inflicted by the industry itself.

There are entire Reddit threads (like this one: https://www.reddit.com/r/solotravel/comments/1r43rsm/reminder_to_recheck_your_hotel_price_if_you/), travel communities, and even dedicated platforms (such as hotelpricetrack.com) that actively encourage travelers to constantly cancel and rebook reservations whenever rates fluctuate slightly.

(Bad) revenue management practices reinforce this behavior: under pressure for pickup, occupancy pacing, or short-term conversion performance, many hotels end up continuously lowering rates as the stay date approaches, rather than doing the opposite.

Moreover, the traditional “pay at hotel” model is often operationally painful for everyone involved: long checkouts, failed authorizations, split payments, queues at reception...

That said, I’m not convinced mandatory prepayment is necessarily the ideal end state either, because it removes part of the psychological flexibility travelers historically associated with hospitality.

Personally, I think the most elegant model would probably look more like Uber: invisible payment infrastructure operating quietly in the background, while guests still retain a sense of freedom during the booking journey and then complete payment instantly with a single click at the end of the experience, without turning either the booking process or the front desk into a financial negotiation.

I see this as an opportunity to redefine trust in hospitality, not simply the end of “pay at hotel.”

In my opinion, the most significant impact of full prepayment is that guest commitment moves from the front desk to the digital decision point. That changes the economics, but also the psychology of booking. For owners, prepaid demand can improve cash-flow visibility, reduce cancellation volatility, and help support more predictable revenue management. But for brands, the risk is that hospitality begins to feel more transactional, like purchasing an airline ticket, and less like entering a relationship with a hotel or destination.

This is where AI becomes essential. If we ask guests to commit earlier, we have to give them more confidence earlier. That means clearer policies, more personalized offers, predictive servicing, automated rebooking options, and payment experiences that reduce anxiety rather than create friction. BNPL may help with affordability, but it does not fully solve the trust equation.

Ultimately, I believe the winners will not be the companies that collect payment fastest. They will be the ones that use data, AI, and service design to turn prepayment into a stronger guest promise: greater certainty, clearer value, and more personalized hospitality before arrival.

The transition toward mandatory full prepayment represents a fundamental "walk away" from the ethical principles that defined hospitality for decades. Traditionally, the industry operated on a simple baseline: payment is due upon fulfillment. Asking guests to pay five figures in full, often months in advance, is a radical departure from the promise of service delivery.

From my perspective, this shift creates significant concerns:

Ethical Fulfillment: We are asking guests to finance operations before we perform, challenging core values of fairness.

The Financial "Skim": This introduces a "black box" of financial handling between brands and properties. Friction and "skim" are added, mirroring the OTA merchant model where funds are withheld from the fulfillment level.

Forced Inefficiency: Creating a world where guests buy insurance or BNPL schemes—solutions the traditional model provided for free—increases hoteliers' booking costs.

Lead-Time Erosion: I expect lead times to compress as travelers hold capital until plans are certain. While removing "placeholder" bookings normalizes demand, it forces a more realistic—albeit late-breaking—forecast.

The winning strategy is leading with accountability, maintaining a payment model reflecting confidence in our execution.

Prepaid bookings reduce cancellations and improve cash flow for hoteliers, but their hidden impact is on the guest journey. The moment a guest pays, the stay becomes a commitment — and that first interaction sets the tone for everything that follows.

Done well, the payment experience should feel seamless and secure: no back-and-forth phone calls to read out card details, no PDF forms emailed and returned. A personalized payment link sent securely to guests replaces that process with a direct, encrypted payment flow guests can complete in seconds, which establishes trust before they've even packed a bag.

From there, hotels need to build on that momentum. Send post-payment right away. Let guests check in from their phone. Use AI-powered communication to answer questions instantly throughout the stay. Collect feedback at checkout. Done right, the entire stay feels like a natural extension of that first seamless interaction.

Ultimately, the shift toward prepayment is about more than payments alone. It reflects a broader move toward a connected, digital-first guest journey that begins well before arrival.