Escaping the Low Impact Loop: How to do Better in 2026?
A sustainability auditor recently sent me her checklist of a property: "Remove single-use soap from bathrooms. Install low-flow showerheads. Replace incandescent bulbs with LEDs. Calculate food waste. Monitor AC complaints to adjust thermostats."
She added, somewhat frustrated: "Never ending. Always the same problems at every hotel."
Different properties, different countries, identical checklist.
Author and systems theorist Donella Meadows looked into why some interventions transform systems while others merely operate on the surface such as adjusting parameters and tweaking some variables (Meadows actually writes: "diddling with the details, arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" [1]). She identified twelve leverage points [see 1]. These points are places to intervene in a system all ranked by effectiveness. At the bottom: adjusting parameters like numbers, rates, and constants. At the top: changing the goals and paradigms that drive the entire system.
In Meadows' framework, most of global hospitality is trapped at leverage point 12. This is the weakest intervention possible. The industry is adjusting parameters: showerhead flow rates, breakfast portion sizes, thermostat settings, light bulb wattage, thermostat settings and so on.
These interventions matter surely, but parameter adjustments are the simplest, most comfortable interventions as they are easy to implement and visible to stakeholders. They also help the hospitality sector to generate reports, demonstrate compliance, satisfy marketing needs. They show "action", without threatening assumptions, existing business models and are increasingly not enough, considering the planetary challenges.
Meanwhile, what is happening on the higher-leverage interventions?
Leverage point 8: Information flows. What if franchise agreements required upward reporting of carbon intensity with the same rigor as RevPAR?
Leverage point 6: System structure. Why do centralized procurement protocols and approved vendor lists force hotels to source food from thousands of kilometres away when fresher, lower-carbon local options exist?
Leverage point 2: System goals. What if we measured hotel success by biodiversity recovered per guest night aside from RevPAR?
Leverage point 1: Paradigms. What if hospitality's purpose wasn't extracting maximum revenue from places but regenerating the destinations that make hospitality viable?
These questions rarely appear in sustainability audits. And if your 2026 sustainability plan resembles a checklist from 2015, you're possibly working with the wrong levers. As the 2025 Planetary Health Check confirms accelerating environmental system disturbances [2], the question isn't whether you're implementing actions (Afterall, hotel leaders have proven they can tweak operation efficiently if the will is there), but it's whether those actions operate at leverage points where transformation actually occurs.
With this in mind, the following three questions emerge:
- What should hospitality prioritise in 2026?
- How would you recommend prioritizing these actions?
- How can technology help make that happen?
References
[1] Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System, The Sustainability Institute. p. 6. https://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/.
[2] Planetary Boundaries Science (PBScience). 2025. Planetary Health Check 2025. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam, Germany. https://www.planetaryhealthcheck.org/wp-content/uploads/PlanetaryHealthCheck2025.pdf