Clearly, the technology evolution in hospitality is a good thing. In addition to the obvious benefits to the daily operation and increased return on investment for owners, it has been the driver behind a consistent wave that an entire genre of hoteliers, including me, have taken advantage of to enjoy successful careers in the commercial discipline, a career path that pretty much didn’t exist 30 years ago.
Channel managers are a perfect example. Made things better for everyone. Eliminating the need for someone to manually adjust pricing in every distribution channel made more complex pricing strategies and more distribution channels possible, increasing returns for the owner. Revenue Managers were able to reallocate the time saved to more analysis and less sitting at a keyboard, doing a repetitive but extremely detailed tasks. Winner.
Rate shoppers, revenue management systems, and even PMS’ are other examples of the innovations that none of us could see living without, even though hotels somehow managed to operate before they existed.
But not every one of the industry’s tech solutions is so clearly a benefit to all the stakeholders.
As an above-property leader, I personally couldn’t live without our sales automation systems. The ability to understand group pace across our portfolio without having relying on anyone else is invaluable. Plus, they communicate with our inventory management systems, give us standardized BEOs, contracts, etc.
Huge benefits, but not without a cost. For the daily user these systems have long learning curves, often including lengthy online training and difficult certification exams. But when you consider the traditional personality profile for a sales manager, a high-tech acumen isn’t really at the top of the list. The inability or unwillingness to embrace the sales system has been at the core in almost every instance where we have had a sales manager fail, which seems to prove the point.
The new wave of BI tools and dashboards are another example. The answer is always yes in the C-suite, when a salesperson is asked if some customized KPI can be added to the dashboard application they are considering purchasing. And what executive team doesn’t want the perfect KPI dashboard to manage the business, right? But when the implementation rolls around, someone deep in the operation is given a new template that they are supposed to fill in manually, or worse yet, a new task of reading numbers on one screen and typing them on another. Good for some, but not for all.
I think it comes down to the definition of disruption. For a technologist, disruption is always good. Period. But not many of us get out of bed in the morning thinking, “Oh boy, I really hope things get shaken up at work today.”
Taking 360-degree approach to disruption is the key. While it would be impossible to always take two steps forward without occasionally taking one step back, understanding the implications of new technology beyond the desired outcomes of the decision makers is key to making it work, and apparently not quite as obvious as it sounds.