It is hard to argue with billions of dollars spent annually on marketing by the largest OTAs. One could certainly make the case that such a robust amount of travel-related content would spark travel wanderlust from even the most "home-rooted" consumer. Over the last 2 years we saw an increase in OTA share vs direct or brand bookings. This seems to indicate that while most brands halted or delayed marketing spend as a way to preserve cash, OTA's were able to take advantage and sway a customer to book on their site instead. Certainly, there may be someone who sees an OTA's commercial on their TV or device and is inspired to plan a trip they previously were not considering taking, but in reality, they were likely already in the mindset of traveling and inspired more by the featured destination than the concept itself. A person who was thinking of spending winter in Hawaii may see an ad for a resort in Costa Rica and consider a change of destination, but they were already in the cycle of planning a trip, even if in the earliest of stages. Or if not a Brand Loyalist, a consumer might see a featured discounted offer from an OTA and perform a search on their site to compare rates, but this does not constitute generating new demand. A more likely source of organic inspiration in today's purchaser base is social media. As the saying goes, "A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words", and in this case, potentially millions of new travelers.